Recent Blog Posts
Which will applies when there are multiple versions?
Estate administration can be substantially less contentious in cases where there are wills to guide the process. Family members and those expecting to serve as personal representatives are often grateful for wills and other estate planning documents drafted by the deceased party. The situation can quickly become unexpectedly complicated if a search of a person's home or safety deposit box uncovers multiple different versions of a will.
What happens in a scenario wherein there are multiple signed wills that may not necessarily all contain the same terms?
The courts should receive all of the wills
Family members and personal representatives might jump to conclusions regarding which will is valid in a case involving multiple copies with different terms. Generally speaking, the most recent document recognized as valid by the courts is the one that governs the probate process.
However, every signed, authentic version of the will located in the early stages of estate administration should go to the probate courts for review. The personal representative must formally lodge each will with the courts.
Did a caregiver pressure a testator to modify their will?
The people closest to a person who died often have an idea of what to expect in their will. Testators often share details about their documents with their close loved ones so that they know what they might inherit in the future.
Sometimes, families reviewing a will see terms that surprise them. They check the document and learn that the testator made last-minute changes in the final months of their life. Those changes might specifically benefit someone who acted as a caregiver to the older adults during their golden years. In such scenarios, family members may have reason to contest the will.
The caregiver may have exerted undue influence
A will should reflect a person's intentions. Other people do not have the right to demand concessions in a will or manipulate a testator into modifying their documents for personal gain.
When an outside party uses their relationship with a testator to affect the terms of a will, the legal term for that manipulation or coercion is "undue influence." Provided that family members can show that a person who received last-minute preferential consideration in a new version of an individual's will had access to them while they were vulnerable, it may be possible to contest the will. The courts may set it aside entirely or may agree to uphold an earlier version of the documents.
Creditor notice is a key component of estate administration
Estate administration involves more than just distributing assets among the heirs or beneficiaries of a deceased individual. Personal representatives must first ensure that they fulfill all of the lingering financial obligations of the decedent.
Frequently, people die with outstanding financial obligations. They may have credit card balances, end-of-life medical care costs and other debts to address. Personal representatives must communicate with creditors during estate administration and pay valid debts using estate resources before distributing what remains among heirs or beneficiaries. A failure to do so could lead to their removal from their position or financial liability for unpaid debts in some cases.
What notice does the law require?
There are technically two separate forms of notice that personal representatives may need to provide to creditors during estate administration. One of their first obligations entails reviewing the decedent's financial records and incoming mail to identify known creditors.
Using a trust to spread out an inheritance
Typically, if you leave someone an inheritance in your will, they get all of the money at once. The estate goes through probate, and the estate executor directs the funds to the appropriate beneficiary. If you left someone $1 million, once the estate has been settled, they would receive the entire balance at one time.
However, you may be interested in spreading the funds out. Perhaps you think it will help the beneficiary make wiser decisions with the money and prevent them from quickly spending all of it. Perhaps the beneficiary is relatively young, so you want to hold some of the money back until they are older. You can use a trust to do so.
Setting up a spendthrift trust
One option is a spendthrift trust, which allows you to dictate how the assets are distributed. Rather than giving the person all of the money at once, you could give them $100,000 per year, over the next decade. The exact amount of the payout and the duration are up to you, but you select a trustee to authorize the payments because it is the trust that owns the funds, rather than the beneficiary.
Have estate resources gone missing?
Estate administration can take months to complete. During that time, beneficiaries and heirs may need to wait to receive property. They may only actually inherit assets after the personal representative has fulfilled their obligations to pay taxes and settle accounts with creditors.
Unfortunately, when the time comes to make distributions to those expecting to inherit, critical resources may have gone missing. Intended beneficiaries and expectant heirs may need to take legal action in cases where resources go missing from an estate and a personal representative cannot properly account for them.
Thorough records should be available
Financial record-keeping is one of the most important obligations associated with the state administration. Personal representatives should inventory assets at the beginning of the probate process. They should keep records of all assets that they distribute to individuals and any property that they liquidate through an estate sale or for the purpose of reimbursing creditors.
A discretionary trust can add flexibility to your estate plan
In some cases, people choose to include a trust as part of their estate plan. They may want to set funds aside for a beneficiary, as an inheritance, but they also want to place those funds in a trust so the money is used in a manner they approve of. The beneficiary cannot just spend their inheritance on anything that they want.
At the same time, some people worry that a trust may limit flexibility. For example, if a trust is earmarked for college tuition or other educational expenses, does that mean the beneficiary loses access to the inheritance if they decide not to attend college?
One way to address this concern is by creating a discretionary trust. It can provide both safeguards and flexibility.
How is this different?
A discretionary trust differs from other types of trusts because it does not require the funds to be used for a single, specific purpose. Instead, the grantor gives the trustee discretion to authorize distributions for a variety of reasons. These may include educational expenses, but they can also cover other uses the trustee believes are appropriate, such as purchasing a home, starting a business or paying medical bills.
Mismanaging estate resources can lead to executor liability
Executors or personal representatives typically receive a minor amount of compensation for their services. What they received depends in part on the complexity and overall value of the estate.
In some cases, they may actually accept more financial risk than they stand to gain in compensation. Personal representatives are potentially vulnerable to litigation brought by beneficiaries or even creditors in cases where they do not properly manage and distribute estate resources.
When could a personal representative face financial responsibility for how they handle estate resources?
When they overlook debts and taxes
Personal representatives generally have a responsibility to pay the financial obligations of the decedent and the estate. They should use estate resources to fulfill all major financial obligations before they make distributions to beneficiaries or heirs. If there is proof that they failed to follow the right procedures and no longer have the resources necessary to pay debts or taxes, they could face personal responsibility for those amounts.
Do you need to leave someone a token inheritance to disinherit them?
If you decide to disinherit someone, it means you are going to leave them out of your will. They may be a direct relative, like one of your adult children, so they expected to inherit assets from you.
In some cases, parents will simply leave that beneficiary out of the estate plan entirely. If you have three children, you may split your assets 50-50 between two of them and not mention the third child at all.
But this can be risky, because that person may claim that you simply forgot about them. They can then use this as a reason to challenge your estate plan, in some cases. As a result, people may decide to leave a minimal inheritance, like leaving the person just $10, so that it is clear they were not forgotten.
This is not a necessary step
You can do this if you want, but it is not necessary. You do not have to leave them a minimal inheritance or any inheritance at all.
Instead, just focus on making your intentions clear. You may want to include a disinheritance clause in the estate plan. You can directly name the individual that you do not want to receive any of your assets, specifying that nothing should go to them. You can tell them why you have made this decision, but you are not legally obligated to do so. As long as you have the disinheritance clause that names them, it makes it clear that this is what you wanted and it is not a simple oversight.
5 tips for handling estate and trust litigation
Disputes over wills and trusts often arise during stressful moments for families where questions about intent, asset distribution and fiduciary conduct can quickly turn into formal claims in probate or civil court.
A clear plan of action helps protect rights, preserve assets and reduce conflict. The steps below explain how estate and trust litigation typically unfolds and what you can do at each stage.
1. Identify the core dispute
Start by defining the issue with precision. Common claims include will contests based on lack of capacity or undue influence, challenges to the validity of trust amendments and objections to accountings.
Also, clarify what you seek to achieve, such as the removal of a fiduciary, surcharge for losses or enforcement of specific distribution terms. A focused claim keeps the process efficient and reduces needless motions.
2. Secure and organize evidence
Challenging a trust? Learn how to prepare for trust litigation
If you're a beneficiary concerned about a trust, you may believe you have no options to address its validity or administration. Unknown to many, the law allows beneficiaries legal recourse when they believe estate planning documents like wills and trusts are suspect.
Sometimes, a solution can be found through informal means like a frank discussion that clears misinterpretations. Other times, litigation may be the only way to resolve the matter when disputes escalate beyond informal resolution. If challenging a trust in California is on your horizon, learning more can strengthen your legal position.
Steps to prepare for trust litigation
Preparing for this legal process is essential. Here's a breakdown of key steps to help you anticipate and prep for what lies ahead.
- Identify concerns and gather records: Pinpoint specific issues like undue influence or trustee misconduct. Collect trust documents, amendments, financial statements and related correspondence.







